top of page

AI Visibility & What does it mean for your brand growth?

Summary: This guide explains how AI visibility works as a three-dimensional diagnostic framework for B2B and SaaS brands. It covers the relationship between Share of Voice (brand mentions), Authority (content citations), and Sentiment (positioning consistency) in AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Marketing leaders will learn how to audit their current AI visibility profile, identify which dimension is blocking growth, and build optimization roadmaps based on their specific bottleneck. The article includes real case studies, a four-phase diagnostic framework, content principles for earning citations, and strategic guidance for seed through Series B stage companies. Unlike generic AEO checklists, this approach uses AI visibility as a diagnostic tool to reveal fundamental gaps in digital brand foundations including positioning clarity, content depth, site architecture, and third-party validation.

 

What this article covers:

  • Why AI visibility matters for B2B, SaaS, healthtech, and fintech brands?

  • The three dimensions of AI visibility: Share of Voice, Authority, and Sentiment

  • Real case studies showing different visibility profiles and their solutions

  • How to diagnose which visibility dimension is your growth bottleneck 

  • A four-phase diagnostic framework: Content Audit, Visibility Audit, Gap Analysis, Strategic Roadmap

  • Content principles that drive citations: Differentiated, Complete, and Recent

  • Self-assessment tools to test your current AI search visibility

  • What This Means for Your Strategy

Smart marketing leaders are reframing how they think about AI search. Instead of chasing a single "AI visibility score" to track and report, they're asking a more strategic question: What does AI visibility actually mean for business growth?

The answer: AI visibility is a diagnostic system that reveals critical gaps in your digital brand foundation.

Why AI Visibility Matters for Your Brand?

 

If you're managing a B2B software, SaaS, healthtech, fintech, or premium consumer brand - the categories where buyers research extensively before purchasing; AI search visibility should be a strategic priority.

Here's why: AI visibility is a three-dimensional framework that builds sustainable competitive advantages both immediately and long-term. Unlike traditional SEO, which requires 6+ months of technical work to show results, AI visibility improvements can impact your brand presence within weeks.

This matters even for challenger brands. When your potential customers are using ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overview to research, compare and consider your solutions, your brand needs to appear in those conversations, not just in traditional search results.

Why AI Search Engines Matter (Despite Being a "Fraction of Traffic")

Before diving into the framework, let's address the elephant in the room: AI search engines currently drive a fraction of total search traffic. So why should CMOs at growth-stage companies prioritize this channel?

Similarweb.png

The "Fraction of Traffic" Argument Misses Three Critical Realities
1. High-Intent Traffic Converts Faster
Users coming through AI search engines aren't browsing, they're ready to transact. They've already used ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity to research options, compare alternatives, and narrow their consideration set. By the time they reach your site, they're further along the buyer journey than traditional search traffic.
We've tracked conversion velocity across channels for multiple clients. Users entering through AI search engines convert 2-3x faster than organic search traffic. They ask fewer questions in sales calls. They require less nurturing content. They've done their homework invisibly, and you're seeing them only when they're ready to act.

2. User Behaviour Has Fundamentally Changed
Your buyers are researching you right now, and you have no visibility into it. The user’s behaviour is more erratic than before. They can start their journey in an AI search engine to discover a solution as much as they can also start their journey in Google’s traditional search and land on AI search engine to compare players. The key focus area is they will land in AI engines to compare your solution against competitors, explain your pricing model, and validate your claims. This invisible research phase is growing rapidly, and traditional analytics won't capture it.

Summarize.jpg

The question therefore, isn't whether AI search will replace Google, it's whether you're building a brand presence that surfaces when your ICP is doing research you can't see.

3. GEO/AEO is Good Organic Marketing
If you stop focusing on the AI aspect and just focus on what optimizing for AI visibility entails, you will understand that it forces you to fix fundamental marketing problems you should have addressed anyway.





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To get mentioned by LLMs, you need: 

  • Differentiated Positioning, NOT keyword-stuffed content that says the same thing as everyone else

  • Authoritative content that actually creates awareness, NOT thin blog posts optimized for search volume

  • Third-party validation for sentiment analysis, NOT just owned media claiming you're the best.

AI search engines are essentially forcing marketers to do what great marketing has always required: clear positioning, complete information, and earned credibility. If you're treating GEO just as a separate channel strategy, you're missing the point.

Slide 16_9 - 22.png

The Three Dimensions of AI Visibility

 

AI visibility isn't a single score. It's a three-dimensional framework that reveals different aspects of your digital brand health. Understanding which dimension is your bottleneck determines your optimization priorities.

Dimension 1: Share of Voice (Mentions)What it measures: How often AI engines recommend your brand name when users ask for solutions in your category.What it indicates: Brand awareness and consideration within your target market.The diagnostic question: When someone asks ChatGPT or Perplexity "What are the best [solution type] for [use case]?" does your brand appear in the response?Share of Voice is about presence in the conversation.It's the AI equivalent of "do we show up when buyers are looking for solutions like ours?" If you have low Share of Voice, you have a top-of-funnel problem. Your brand isn't part of the consideration set AI engines reference.This doesn't necessarily mean you need more content, it might mean your positioning isn't clear enough for AI engines to categorize you correctly, or you lack the third-party signals that validate your claims.

 

Dimension 2: Authority (Citations)What it measures: How often AI engines use your content as source material when building overviews or answering questions.What it indicates: Whether your content is trustworthy and substantive enough to be referenced.The diagnostic question: When AI engines generate summaries or explanations in your domain, do they cite your website as a source?Authority is about being seen as credible. You can have strong brand awareness (high mentions) but low authority if your content doesn't provide the depth and structure AI engines need to extract reliable information.This is where content quality matters more than content volume. A single comprehensive, well-structured guide that thoroughly addresses a topic will earn more citations than ten thin blog posts hitting the same keywords.

 

Dimension 3: Sentiment of VoiceWhat it measures: The context and quality of how you're mentioned - are you delivering on the value proposition you promised, how happy are your customers.What it indicates: Whether your actual brand positioning matches how you're being represented in AI responses.The diagnostic question: When AI engines mention you, is the surrounding context aligned with how you want to be perceived?Sentiment reveals positioning consistency. You might appear frequently (high Share of Voice) and be cited often (high Authority), but if the sentiment doesn't match your intended positioning, you have a messaging problem.

Different Playbooks for different visibility challenges

(Two Real Cases)

Understanding how these three dimensions interact reveals different optimization pathways. Here are two brands with opposite visibility profiles, each requiring completely different strategies.

Case A: Healthcare Brand (Series A) - High Mentions, Low Citations

The Situation: A healthcare technology company with strong media presence and brand awareness was consistently mentioned by AI engines when users asked about solutions in their category. However, their citation rate was surprisingly low. AI engines rarely used their website as a source when explaining concepts or building comparisons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Diagnosis: When we audited their visibility patterns, we found the culprit: 

  • Their Google Ads landing pages were being indexed and picked up by AI overviews instead of their authoritative content. 

  • These pages were optimized for paid search conversion - short, benefit-focused copy with strong CTAs but minimal educational depth.

AI engines were finding the thin landing pages first and correctly assessing them as non-authoritative sources.

The Implication: This wasn't a content creation problem. They had excellent educational content, it just wasn't architecturally positioned to be discovered and cited. 

The solution required

  • Restructuring their page content structure, and 

  • Ensuring their authoritative content had stronger internal linking and 

  • Clearer topical relevance signals.

The Bottleneck: Page content structure and content discoverability, not just content quality.

Case B: SaaS Brand (Seed Stage) - High Citations, Low Mentions

The Situation: A SaaS company at seed stage had an impressive 25% citation rate, when AI engines discussed topics in their domain, they frequently referenced the company's content as source material. However, when users asked for product recommendations or solution comparisons, the brand was rarely mentioned.

The Diagnosis: This company had invested heavily in educational content. Their founders were subject matter experts who published in-depth technical guides, whitepapers, and documentation. Their top of funnel or informational content was excellent and bottom of funnel or transactional content was thin. AI engines recognized this content as authoritative and cited it regularly.

 

However, they had minimal third-party validation. No customer testimonials on review sites, limited press coverage, no user-generated content discussing their solution. From an AI engine's perspective, they were a credible source of information but not a validated solution provider.

The Implication: They didn't need more owned content, they were already winning on that front. They needed social proof and third-party signals. The solution required building out their presence on software review platforms, earning earned media coverage, encouraging customer case studies, and creating environments where users would discuss their product.

The Bottleneck: Third-party validation and social proof, not content authority.

Each Brand's Visibility Profile Reveals Different Strategic Gaps

These cases illustrate why treating AI visibility as a single score is misleading. Both brands had visibility but different dimensions were strong or weak, revealing completely different underlying problems:

  • High mentions + Low citations = Content discoverability or depth problem

  • Low mentions + High citations = Third-party validation or positioning problem

  • High in all three but wrong sentiment = Messaging & user feedback consistency problem

  • Low across all dimensions = Foundational digital presence problem

Screenshot 2025-12-23 at 9.52.43 PM.png
Website Creatives.jpg
Screenshot 2025-12-23 at 8.40.10 PM.png

Your optimization strategy should be dictated by which dimension is your bottleneck, not by following a generic "AI SEO checklist."

Summarize (1).jpg

Definer Brands’ Diagnostic Framework

Before you optimize anything, you need to understand where you actually stand. We've developed a four-phase framework that maps AI visibility to business reality.

Phase 1: Content Audit

AI visibility doesn't exist in a vacuum, it builds on your existing digital foundation. We start by assessing:

Content Volume and Entry Points:

  • How many indexed pages serve as potential entry points?

  • What's the distribution across your site (blog, product pages, guides, documentation)?

  • Which pages currently drive organic traffic?

  • Do you have any topical authority?

Content Type Distribution: We categorize your existing content by intent type and measure it as a percentage of your total indexed pages:

  • Informational content (educational, explains concepts): __%

  • Navigational content (about us, company info, team): __%

  • Commercial content (product pages, feature comparisons): __%

  • Transactional content (pricing, sign-up, contact): __%

This distribution reveals whether you're top-heavy (lots of awareness content, weak conversion content) or bottom-heavy (strong product pages but no educational air cover).

Current Search Performance:

  • Which intent-based queries in your ICP's buyer journey do you already have visibility for? - This gives a cue on your topical authority, which directly impacts your citation score.

  • Where are the gaps in your search presence?

  • What topics have you covered vs. what remains?

This audit establishes baseline digital maturity. A seed-stage company with 20 indexed pages has different optimization priorities than a Series B company with 500 pages of existing content.

 

Phase 2: Visibility Audit

Now we measure your current standing across all three dimensions:

Share of Voice Testing: We run systematic queries across AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) simulating how your ICP would search:

  • "Best [solution type] for [use case]"

  • "Compare [your category] solutions for [specific need]"

  • "[Problem statement] - what tools can help?"

We track: How often you appear, position in responses, context of mentions.

Authority Assessment: We analyze citations across informational queries:

  • "How does [concept in your domain] work?"

  • "What is [technical term relevant to your space]?"

  • "Guide to [process your product supports]"

We measure: Citation frequency, which content gets cited, whether citations are primary or supporting.

Sentiment Analysis: We evaluate the qualitative context of your mentions:

  • How are you positioned? (Premium, budget, specialized, general-purpose)

  • What use cases are you associated with?

  • What differentiators are highlighted?

  • Does your offsite mentions match your intended positioning?

This phase produces your visibility profile, a clear picture of which dimensions are strong, which are weak, and where the gaps exist.

 

Phase 3: Gap Analysis

With your current state mapped, we identify specific gaps:

Intent Coverage Gaps: Which stages of your buyer journey lack content coverage? Are you missing:

  • Problem awareness content (they don't know the problem exists)

  • Solution education content (they know the problem, exploring solution types)

  • Alternative comparison content (evaluating specific options)

  • Implementation guidance content (ready to buy, need confidence)

Content Quality Gaps: Where does existing content need work:

  • Refresh content: Content that's outdated, incomplete, or poorly structured

  • New Content: Topics with no coverage that AI engines prioritize

  • Depth deficits: Thin content that needs expansion

Validation Gaps: Where are third-party signals missing:

  • Review platform presence

  • Industry publication mentions

  • User-generated content and discussions

  • Case studies and customer testimonials

  • Expert citations and endorsements

Each gap type requires different resources and timelines to address.

Phase 4: Strategic Roadmap

Based on your business stage, dimension profile, and identified gaps, we build a prioritized roadmap:

Prioritization Principles:

  1. Remove the primary bottleneck first. If low citations are preventing mentions, fix content depth before investing in PR. If low third-party validation is the issue, earning social proof matters more than creating more owned content.
     

  2. Match effort to business stage. A seed-stage company needs foundational positioning and core content. A Series B company needs sophistication and category authority. The tactics differ.
     

  3. Balance refresh vs. create. Often the highest-ROI move is improving what you have rather than creating net-new content. We determine the optimal mix.
     

  4. Sequence strategically. Some improvements unlock others. Site architecture fixes make subsequent content creation more effective. Positioning clarity makes PR outreach more successful.
     

The output is a roadmap that answers:

  • Which dimension do we tackle first?

  • What's the minimum viable improvement to unblock progress?

  • Should we prioritize refreshing existing content or creating new?

  • What third-party validation do we need to build?

  • How does this sequence over the next 6-12 months?

The Content Principles That Drive All Three Dimensions

Regardless of which dimension you're optimizing, three content characteristics consistently drive AI visibility. Understanding these principles helps you create content that performs across all three dimensions simultaneously.

Summarize (2).jpg

Principle 1: Differentiated

AI engines favour unique PoVs. Unlike the SEO era where you could rank by saying the same thing as everyone else with slightly different keywords, LLMs actively filter out redundant content.

What differentiated means:

  • Your content reflects actual business positioning, not generic category descriptions

  • You explain not just what you do, but why your approach differs

  • Your perspective challenges or extends conventional wisdom

  • Your examples and use cases are specific to your experience

This isn't about being contrarian for the sake of it; it's about having a genuine point of view that stems from your actual market position.

If you're a premium solution, your content should reflect depth and sophistication. If you're built for a specific vertical, your examples should be industry-specific. If you've invented a new methodology, your content should educate on that approach.

Why it matters for AI visibility: LLMs are trained to identify and surface unique insights. Generic content gets filtered. Differentiated content gets cited and quoted. Unless LLM is learning something new from your site, it has no reason to quote you as a source.

Principle 2: Complete

AI engines favour comprehensiveness. They want to extract complete answers, not send users to multiple sources to piece together information.

What complete means:

  • The page fully answers the question it's addressing

  • Related concepts are explained or linked to clear explanations

  • There are no information gaps that require the user to search elsewhere

  • Internal linking creates clear paths to related content

This brings back classic SEO best practices:

  • Interlinking

  • Topic clusters, pillar content

but for a different reason. It's not about link authority; it's about creating a complete knowledge graph that AI engines can navigate and reference.

Why it matters for AI visibility: When an AI engine can find a complete answer on your site (or within your interconnected content), it's more likely to cite you as a source.

 

Principle 3: Recent

AI engines prioritize currency. Outdated information is actively penalized in ranking signals.

What recent means:

  • Content is regularly updated to reflect current state

  • Dates are visible (published and last updated)

  • Time-sensitive information is maintained

  • Examples reference current tools, practices, trends

This doesn't mean rewriting everything constantly, it means having a maintenance rhythm where high-value content gets refreshed when the information changes or when new developments occur in the space.

Why it matters for AI visibility: LLMs are trained on more recent data than ever before and prioritize freshness as a trust signal. Stale content, even if once authoritative, loses visibility over time.

The Plus Factor: Third-Party Validation

Beyond these three content characteristics, there's a fourth element that dramatically impacts all three dimensions of AI visibility: how other sources talk about you.

Why third-party signals matter: AI engines don't just read your website, they synthesize information from across the web. When they generate responses, they cross-reference multiple sources to validate claims.

In traditional SEO, this validation happened through backlinks. In AI search, it happens through semantic validation. Other websites, reviews, articles, social media posts, and forums mentioning or discussing your brand in ways that confirm (or contradict) what your owned content claims.

This means:

  • Press coverage and earned media carry more weight

  • User reviews and testimonials on third-party platforms matter

  • Industry publication mentions contribute to authority

  • Social media discussions provide sentiment signals

  • Even forum posts and community discussions play a role

The implications for strategy: You can't fully control AI visibility with owned content alone. You need to actively build third-party validation through PR, customer advocacy, review site presence, and thought leadership that earns citations from industry publications.

The Key Insight: Good AI Search Visibility Enforces Good Marketing Fundamentals

 

When you map all these elements, a pattern emerges: the requirements for AI visibility are remarkably similar to the requirements for strong marketing foundations.

You need:

  • Clear, differentiated positioning (not generic messaging)

  • Authoritative content with genuine depth (not thin SEO content)

  • Complete information interlinked appropriately(not isolated pages)

  • Fresh, maintained content (not publish-and-forget)

  • Third-party validation (not just owned claims)

  • Proper site structure (not haphazard organization)

These aren't new concepts. They're fundamental marketing principles that many brands have deprioritized in favor of growth hacks, keyword optimization, and channel-specific tactics.

AI search is essentially forcing marketers to return to these fundamentals but with higher technical standards for how information is structured and presented.

Before You Optimize: The Starting Point Assessment

Before implementing any AI visibility strategy, assess where you actually stand. This self-diagnostic will reveal whether you're ready to optimize or need to build foundations first.

Foundation Checklist

Question 1: Do you have strong SEO fundamentals?

Ask these questions to find out if you have a strong SEO

  • Do you have diverse content covering different buyer journey stages?

  • Is your site structure logical and well-organized?

  • Do you have a clear topical authority in your space?

  • Are your pages technically sound (fast load times, mobile-optimized, properly indexed)?

If no: Focus on SEO foundations first. AI visibility builds on top of basic digital presence. Fix the fundamentals before optimizing for AI engines.

Question 2: Are your pages structured for both humans and LLMs?

Ask these questions to find out how structured your pages are

  • Do your pages have clear headers that logically organize information?

  • Are complex concepts broken down and explained?

  • Do you use formatting (lists, tables, callouts) to make information scannable?

  • Is your most important content easy to extract and summarize?

If no: Restructure existing high-value content before creating new content.

Question 3: Is your content genuinely differentiated?

Answer these questions to find out if your product differentiation is reflected in your content

  • Can someone read your content and understand what makes your approach unique?

  • Do you have a point of view that differs from generic category information?

  • Are your examples and use cases specific rather than abstract?

If no: Clarify positioning before scaling content production.

 

Save this image for using as a checklist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visibility Dimension Diagnostic

Can you test your current visibility on your own? Well, it’s scrappy but you can try the below to prompt different AI Search Engines. And try them atleast 10 times in incognito mode. AI search engines give different results in every instance hence the need to repeat 10 times. 

Also, if you don’t use incognito it will use its memory to give you answers, making it a biased answer.

  1. Share of Voice test: Open ChatGPT or Perplexity. Ask "What are the best [your solution category] for [your ICP's use case]?" Do you appear? How many times out of 10 trials?

  2. Authority test: Ask "How does [concept in your domain] work?" or "Explain [technical process your product addresses]." Are you cited as a source?

  3. Sentiment test: In mentions where you appear, what's the context? Are you positioned how you want to be?
     

What this reveals:

  • All low? You have a foundational visibility problem.

  • High mentions, low citations? Content depth/structure issue.

  • Low mentions, high citations? Third-party validation gap.

  • High in both but wrong sentiment? Positioning inconsistency.

For best results use known platforms for giving you a score like Otterly, Ziptie, Profound, Peec or even SEMRush; whichever fits your budget. 

The Mindset Shift Required

AI visibility isn't a channel to optimize, it's a diagnostic framework for evaluating your digital brand health.

The question isn't "Should we optimize for AI search?" The question is: "What does our AI visibility profile reveal about gaps in our current strategy?"

  • If you have low Share of Voice: You have a top-of-funnel awareness problem or a positioning clarity problem. AI engines don't know how to categorize you or don't see enough signals that you're a relevant solution. Also could be low third party validation. Even if your owned content is strong, AI engines don't see external confirmation.

  • If you have low Authority: You have a content depth problem or a site architecture problem. Your content isn't substantive enough to be cited as a source, or it's not discoverable.

  • If you have sentiment misalignment: You have a messaging consistency problem. What you say about yourself doesn't match how the market talks about you.

The Competitive Advantage

Here's what separates companies that will win in AI search from those that will struggle:

Companies that will struggle:

  • Treating AI visibility as a vanity metric to report

  • Asking "What's our score?" instead of "What does our profile reveal?"

  • Looking for quick optimization hacks

  • Trying to game AI engines with keyword stuffing or thin content

  • Ignoring fundamental positioning and content quality issues

Companies that will win:

  • Using AI visibility as a diagnostic for digital brand health

  • Asking "Which dimension is our bottleneck?"

  • Fixing foundational issues before scaling tactics

  • Investing in differentiated, authoritative content

  • Building third-party validation systematically

  • Understanding this is fundamentally about better marketing, not AI tricks

 

The brands winning in AI search aren't gaming algorithms. They're building fundamentally stronger marketing foundations, clearer positioning, deeper content, better site architecture, more earned credibility. AI search engines are essentially quality filters. They surface brands that have done the hard work of building real authority and clear differentiation.

What This Means for Your Strategy?

If you're a marketing leader at a growth-stage company, here's how to think about AI visibility:

Don't start with tactics.

Don't begin by creating "AI-optimized content" or following generic GEO checklists.

Start with diagnosis. Understand your current visibility profile.

Which dimension is strong? Which is weak? What does that reveal about your digital brand foundation?

 

Fix the bottleneck.

  • If low citations are preventing mentions, invest in content depth and site architecture.

  • If low third-party validation is the issue, build social proof programs.

  • If positioning is unclear, clarify messaging before scaling content.

 

Recognize this is fundamentally about marketing quality. The companies treating AEO as a separate channel to optimize will chase metrics. The companies recognizing it as a forcing function for better marketing fundamentals will build sustainable advantages.

Match strategy to business stage. A seed-stage company needs positioning clarity and foundational content. A Series A company needs depth and early authority. A Series B company needs sophisticated thought leadership and category ownership. The tactics differ.

At Definer Brands, we don't start with optimization tactics. We start by auditing your visibility profile across all three dimensions:

  1. Share of Voice,

  2. Authority, and

  3. Sentiment.

This audit reveals where you stand in your digital brand building journey and which dimension is your bottleneck. From there, we develop a stage-appropriate roadmap that addresses root causes, not symptoms.

Because here's the reality: AI visibility isn't about hitting a number. It's about understanding the connection between how AI engines perceive your brand and the underlying health of your digital marketing foundation.

The companies asking "What's our AI visibility score?" are chasing vanity metrics, because it means nothing without the rest of the context. The companies asking "Which dimension of visibility is our growth bottleneck?" will build marketing foundations that perform across all channels, AI search included.

 

Want to understand your brand's AI visibility profile? We audit your visibility dimensions and map them to your business objectives. Let's talk about what your AI search presence reveals about your marketing foundation.

Website Creatives (1).jpg

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. What is AI visibility and why does it matter for B2B brands? AI visibility is a three-dimensional framework that reveals critical gaps in your digital brand foundation. It measures Share of Voice (brand mentions), Authority (content citations), and Sentiment (positioning consistency) in AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. For B2B software, SaaS, healthtech, fintech, or premium consumer brands - the categories where buyers research extensively before purchasing - AI search visibility is a strategic priority. AI visibility is a three-dimensional framework that builds sustainable competitive advantages both immediately and long-term. Unlike traditional SEO, which requires 6+ months of technical work to show results, AI visibility improvements can impact your brand presence within weeks. When potential customers are using ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overview to research, compare and consider solutions, your brand needs to appear in those conversations, not just in traditional search results.

2. How is AI visibility different from traditional SEO? Unlike traditional SEO, which requires 6+ months of technical work to show results, AI visibility improvements can impact your brand presence within weeks. The key differences in what AI visibility requires: Differentiated Positioning, NOT keyword-stuffed content that says the same thing as everyone else Authoritative content that actually creates awareness, NOT thin blog posts optimized for search volume Third-party validation for sentiment analysis, NOT just owned media claiming you're the best AI search engines are essentially forcing marketers to do what great marketing has always required: clear positioning, complete information, and earned credibility. If you're treating GEO just as a separate channel strategy, you're missing the point. AI engines are trained to identify and surface unique insights. Generic content gets filtered. Differentiated content gets cited and quoted. Unless an LLM is learning something new from your site, it has no reason to quote you as a source.

3. Why should CMOs prioritize AI search engines despite low current traffic? The "Fraction of Traffic" Argument Misses Three Critical Realities: 1. High-Intent Traffic Converts Faster Users coming through AI search engines aren't browsing, they're ready to transact. They've already used ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity to research options, compare alternatives, and narrow their consideration set. By the time they reach your site, they're further along the buyer journey than traditional search traffic. We've tracked conversion velocity across channels for multiple clients. Users entering through AI search engines convert 2-3x faster than organic search traffic. They ask fewer questions in sales calls. They require less nurturing content. They've done their homework invisibly, and you're seeing them only when they're ready to act. 2. User Behaviour Has Fundamentally Changed Your buyers are researching you right now, and you have no visibility into it. The user's behaviour is more erratic than before. They can start their journey in an AI search engine to discover a solution as much as they can also start their journey in Google's traditional search and land on AI search engine to compare players. The key focus area is they will land in AI engines to compare your solution against competitors, explain your pricing model, and validate your claims. This invisible research phase is growing rapidly, and traditional analytics won't capture it. The question therefore, isn't whether AI search will replace Google, it's whether you're building a brand presence that surfaces when your ICP is doing research you can't see. 3. GEO/AEO is Good Organic Marketing If you stop focusing on the AI aspect and just focus on what optimizing for AI visibility entails, you will understand that it forces you to fix fundamental marketing problems you should have addressed anyway. To get mentioned by LLMs, you need: Differentiated Positioning Authoritative content that actually creates awareness Third-party validation AI search engines are essentially forcing marketers to do what great marketing has always required: clear positioning, complete information, and earned credibility.

4. What does high mentions but low citations indicate? High Share of Voice (mentions) but low Authority (citations) indicates a content discoverability or depth problem.

5. What does low mentions but high citations indicate? Low Share of Voice (mentions) but high Authority (citations) indicates a third-party validation or positioning problem.

6. What are the three content principles that drive AI visibility? Differentiated AI engines favour unique PoVs. Unlike the SEO era where you could rank by saying the same thing as everyone else with slightly different keywords, LLMs actively filter out redundant content. What differentiated means: Your content reflects actual business positioning, not generic category descriptions You explain not just what you do, but why your approach differs Your perspective challenges or extends conventional wisdom Your examples and use cases are specific to your experience This isn't about being contrarian for the sake of it; it's about having a genuine point of view that stems from your actual market position. If you're a premium solution, your content should reflect depth and sophistication. If you're built for a specific vertical, your examples should be industry-specific. Why it matters for AI visibility: LLMs are trained to identify and surface unique insights. Generic content gets filtered. Differentiated content gets cited and quoted. Unless LLM is learning something new from your site, it has no reason to quote you as a source. Principle 2: Complete AI engines favour comprehensiveness. They want to extract complete answers, not send users to multiple sources to piece together information. What complete means: The page fully answers the question it's addressing Related concepts are explained or linked to clear explanations There are no information gaps that require the user to search elsewhere Internal linking creates clear paths to related content This brings back classic SEO best practices: interlinking and topic clusters, pillar content, but for a different reason. It's not about link authority; it's about creating a complete knowledge graph that AI engines can navigate and reference. Why it matters for AI visibility: When an AI engine can find a complete answer on your site (or within your interconnected content), it's more likely to cite you as a source. Principle 3: Recent AI engines prioritize currency. Outdated information is actively penalized in ranking signals. What recent means: Content is regularly updated to reflect current state Dates are visible (published and last updated) Time-sensitive information is maintained Examples reference current tools, practices, trends This doesn't mean rewriting everything constantly, it means having a maintenance rhythm where high-value content gets refreshed when the information changes or when new developments occur in the space. Why it matters for AI visibility: LLMs are trained on more recent data than ever before and prioritize freshness as a trust signal. Stale content, even if once authoritative, loses visibility over time. The Plus Factor: Third-Party Validation Beyond these three content characteristics, there's a fourth element that dramatically impacts all three dimensions of AI visibility: how other sources talk about you. Why third-party signals matter: AI engines don't just read your website, they synthesize information from across the web. When they generate responses, they cross-reference multiple sources to validate claims. In traditional SEO, this validation happened through backlinks. In AI search, it happens through semantic validation. Other websites, reviews, articles, social media posts, and forums mentioning or discussing your brand in ways that confirm (or contradict) what your owned content claims.

7. Should seed-stage companies prioritize AI visibility differently than Series B companies? Yes, strategy must match business stage. Match strategy to business stage: A seed-stage company needs positioning clarity and foundational content. A Series A company needs depth and early authority. A Series B company needs sophisticated thought leadership and category ownership. The tactics differ. From the Strategic Roadmap section: Match effort to business stage. A seed-stage company needs foundational positioning and core content. A Series B company needs sophistication and category authority. The tactics differ. From Foundation Checklist: A seed-stage company with 20 indexed pages has different optimization priorities than a Series B company with 500 pages of existing content.

bottom of page